We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Embedded Database solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"
"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"The solution is very fast."
"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."
"The scalability is very good."
"I like Oracle because it is a backward-compatible solution."
"The application development is very user-friendly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product can be scaled in any direction and a very nice feature is that you can logically split the database by the value of the data, which is great."
"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."
"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."
"They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Technical support is below our expectations currently. It could be improved."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."
"The only big hurdle for us is that most customers aren't familiar with it, so it's scary. If you're in commercial environments, everybody knows SQL, everybody knows Oracle, or whatever."
"Advanced security would be a good additional feature."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 2nd in Embedded Database with 27 reviews while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is ranked 5th in Embedded Database. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Progress OpenEdge RDBMS writes "Customizable, intelligent, and reacts in real-time". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server, MariaDB and Apache Derby, whereas Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is most compared with SAP HANA. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Progress OpenEdge RDBMS report.
See our list of best Embedded Database vendors.
We monitor all Embedded Database reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.