We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and SQL Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."
"The most valuable feature is that Database-In-Memory is more consistent and faster than traditional databases as it requires fewer CPUs to process instructions."
"The solution is very fast."
"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"The solution's ROI is excellent."
"I haven't really experienced any issues that required the assistance of technical support."
"Technical support is very good."
"It is a stable product, and it runs seamlessly. It is not complex."
"What I like most is the management, as it is very easy compared with other products."
"The solution has a reliable database."
"They have improved the UI and ease of accessing the database and server which is good. You can load it up and start using it from the very minute it is implemented."
"The solution is very intuitive and easy to use."
"It is an extremely stable solution."
"The product could be more economical."
"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."
"We often have to find solutions on our own through the support site, so there's room for improvement in this regard."
"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."
"The solution could improve by having better integration."
"Their support could be better. There should be more visibility on the progress of the ticket, and their last line of support should be more knowledgeable. Other than that, we have nothing to complain about."
"More things in SQL Server need to be automated."
"The performance could be better."
"The price could be better. It costs a lot, and competing databases like Postgres are free."
"The solution could be better integrated with the SQL Server Studio tool."
"When transferring data from the SQL Server to Excel, the data types are not copied correctly. This issue might be associated with the formatting of the data types."
"Performance could be improved."
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 8th in Relational Databases Tools with 27 reviews while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases Tools with 260 reviews. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Easy to use and provides good speed and data recovery". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, MariaDB and Apache Derby, whereas SQL Server is most compared with MariaDB, SAP HANA, Oracle Database, LocalDB and IBM Db2 Database. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. SQL Server report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.