We performed a comparison between Oracle GlassFish and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server."The products offers EE support."
"It has good integration with security features, including OWASP."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"The solution works well in load balancing."
"The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service."
"It is good because it's easy to use. It doesn't crash frequently like other servers."
"We've got the support we require. If ever there is an issue, can just call on Oracle and they will assist us."
"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"The tool's implementation should be easier. The product is also expensive."
"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."
"There's a bug related to the managed services."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually."
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution."
Earn 20 points
Oracle GlassFish is ranked 9th in Application Server while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. Oracle GlassFish is rated 6.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GlassFish writes "Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". Oracle GlassFish is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and TmaxSoft JEUS.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.