Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ping Identity Logo
5,385 views|4,052 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
1,902 views|1,440 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ping Identity Platform and Symantec Siteminder based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution.""What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions.""The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in.""The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities.""The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches.""It's pretty stable as a product.""It provides ease of connecting all our devices.""It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Ping Identity Platform Pros →

"It is reliable.""It provides the breadth and the width to provide solutions for the different kinds of technologies which we have.""Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability.""It is very scalable. We have a very large customer base: 75 million customers.""Ease of use is very good, for administrating it. It's very well known.""The solution is easy to use for our managers.""Authentication & Authorization are important because all the sites need authentication for security purposes. That has been handled pretty well all these years with SSO.""SAML is the best thing we're using right now because there is no need for creating an external account."

More Symantec Siteminder Pros →

Cons
"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base.""The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.""Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported.""They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement.""The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings.""Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.""PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration.""The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning."

More Ping Identity Platform Cons →

"I'd like to see a rework of the user directory configuration.""We are finding some compatibility issues. We're still working with CA on them.""I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product. I'm not seeing the innovation when it comes to biometrics in the product.""As we are moving in to the mobility space, this is where we really see SiteMinder and their other product really come together to provide a solution base to a different area where the IoT is coming, the different business communications are happening. All of those things require authentication and we really want to see this product grow into that role.""To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly.""The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live.""I would prefer to see their SAML integration be a more streamlined and easier interface.""We would like to the OAuth be more stable, more issues being fixed rather than not."

More Symantec Siteminder Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."
  • "PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."
  • "The product is costly."
  • "The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • "Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."
  • More Ping Identity Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."
  • "I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."
  • "CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."
  • "Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."
  • "The licensing is fair for this solution."
  • "Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Siteminder Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
    Top Answer:It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.
    Top Answer:It doesn't have a feature for... or maybe it has, but for modern authentication, like OAuth or OIDC. We haven't utilized that portion; we haven't really looked at it because our priority is LDAP… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    5,385
    Comparisons
    4,052
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    535
    Rating
    8.6
    13th
    Views
    1,902
    Comparisons
    1,440
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    298
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
    Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
    Learn More
    Overview
    IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

    Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

    Sample Customers
    Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
    British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company42%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm35%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ping Identity Platform is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 19 reviews while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 13th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 69 reviews. Ping Identity Platform is rated 8.4, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ping Identity Platform writes " A highly stable tool offering extremely helpful technical support to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Easy to implement and customize and very stable". Ping Identity Platform is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, Microsoft Active Directory, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and RSA SecurID, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with ForgeRock, Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID and Red Hat Single Sign On. See our Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.