We compared SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Based on user reviews, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect both have strengths in advanced threat detection and customer support. However, while SentinelOne's focus is on comprehensive protection and ease of use, ThreatLocker excels in providing granular control and visibility over file activities. SentinelOne users appreciate the platform's AI technology and user-friendly interface, while ThreatLocker users value its seamless integration with existing systems and effectiveness in preventing unauthorized access. Overall, both products have received positive feedback from users, with SentinelOne standing out for its proactive security measures and ThreatLocker for its granular control features.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete stands out with its comprehensive threat detection, advanced AI, intuitive interface, and swift response to emerging threats. In contrast, ThreatLocker Protect offers advanced threat detection, seamless integration, ease of use, reliable blocking, granular control, and visibility over file activities.
Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect differ in terms of setup cost. Users have expressed their perspectives on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of both products. While customers have shared insights about the cost-effectiveness and ease of setting up ThreatLocker Protect, opinions on the setup cost of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are also available., The ROI for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is driven by its comprehensive protection, real-time threat detection, and proactive security measures, while ThreatLocker Protect offers significant value and returns by enhancing security, preventing threats, and minimizing potential damages.
Room for Improvement: Users have provided feedback on SentinelOne Singularity Complete that highlights the need for improvements in system performance, user interface, customization options, reporting capabilities, and integration with other security solutions. On the other hand, for ThreatLocker Protect, user feedback specifically focuses on identifying the product's drawbacks.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for SentinelOne Singularity Complete indicate that the timeframe for deployment and setup are generally the same and should be considered together. However, the user reviews for ThreatLocker Protect highlight the variability in the time required for deployment, setup, and implementation phases., Customer service for SentinelOne Singularity Complete has been positively praised for its prompt and helpful assistance, as well as reliable and efficient support staff. On the other hand, ThreatLocker Protect's customer service also receives high praise for its prompt and helpful assistance, knowledgeable and efficient support team, and commitment to customer satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 148 interviews we conducted recently with SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The user interface, ease of maintenance, and the efficient way to identify the root cause of an incident to see all the factors that contributed to it are the most valuable features."
"Device control and network control are valuable."
"Singularity's threat-hunting platform is user-friendly, and I like the built-in remote access feature."
"It delivers the type of security which we were hoping for, since we have a lot of different endpoint users utilizing different types of software. We have people who only use Office software, like email, Word, and PDFs. Then, we have people who use some applications that other people wrote. We also write applications in-house using people who develop software. Therefore, we have some machines using very high-end developer software for mechanical development, electronic development, and software development. Those users are used to managing their PC on their own. The centralize platform allows us to differentiate between those three groups of people. We have overall control and can oversee the security levels at all the endpoints. They have not yet been blocked in any way when performing the functions"
"The most valuable features include the agent installation and update processes."
"The most valuable feature is the rollback functionality, which is highly impactful. We can roll back deleted or compromised files. The Ranger feature is also interesting. It enables the solution to visualize the logs and assets that are not yet covered by the platform. Ranger also enables deployments and revisions. It doesn't always work, but it's effective 90 percent of the time."
"It protects your machine, and it does an excellent job using AI to determine an attack and stop the attack. Its most powerful feature is prevention, and it can unwind ransomware activity as well. So, it is a really useful product in that sense."
"The tool saves 50% of the staff's time."
"The sandbox functionality is fantastic."
"The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need."
"The most valuable feature is selective elevation, which allows elevating an individual process to admin privilege without granting admin privilege to that user, which has been by far the most useful feature outside of the overall solution itself."
"The biggest improvement has been knowing that something unauthorized isn't going to get installed on anyone’s machines."
"ThreatLocker Allowlisting has all of these features integrated into one console, making it effective."
"Using ThreatLocker is effortless because I can access it from an app on my phone, so I can help clients after hours. My client had an issue while I was at dinner, and I didn't have a tech on the problem, but I could deal with it from my phone. I can see what the client is doing and approve or deny it. It helps me deliver better service to my clients when they need it."
"Application control, ring-fencing, and storage control are the most important features, followed closely by elevation."
"The most valuable feature is probably the ability to block programs from running. ThreatLocker has some built-in features that make it super easy. You can also contact their support within the program. If you're having issues, you can click on that button and connect with someone in five to 10 seconds."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Detections could be improved."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"In automation, if we could schedule when we run the task and on which systems we want to run the task, it would improve automation."
"It is complicated to do certain tasks."
"In terms of improvement, the documentation could be better. I would also like to see SingularityOne compatibility with Huntress, and the tighter integration between them would bring more to the table."
"With respect to product patches, it should have the ability to patch directly from SentinelOne, rather than be presented with a list and have to do it separately."
"One of the things they could do is extend the product range to include Android and iPhone so that you could have the app on your phone as well. There is probably something going on there with that, but that's something that they're lacking at the moment. For instance, if I was to have to recommend a client to protect their phone, I'd have to recommend Norton or something else. I don't have an answer within the SentinelOne solution."
"The update process can be better. It is very easy to deploy, but over a long period, the updating process can be a little messy. In some EDR solutions, you end up with a very good mechanism to push new versions. It could do with a little work in that area. It is not particularly difficult, but it could do with a little work."
"The ability to integrate this product with an antivirus solution would be welcome. Even consolidation with more security products, like Umbrella networking abilities etc. to provide more on this platform, that would be great."
"The false positive rate has room for improvement."
"There are some times when applications get submitted, the hashes don't really line up."
"Adding applications to the allowlist can sometimes feel overwhelming."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The portal can be a little overwhelming at times from an administration point of view. It displays a lot of information, and it's all useful. However, sometimes there is too much on the screen to sift through, especially if you're trying to diagnose a client's problem with a piece of software. Maybe something has stopped working since they updated it, and we need to see if ThreatLocker is blocking a component of that software."
"We identified several areas that we would like to see improved."
"One area I see for improvement is in the visibility of support tickets within the ThreatLocker ticketing system."
"The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself."
"ThreatLocker could offer more flexible training, like online or offline classes after hours. The fact that they even provide weekly training makes it seem silly to suggest, but some people can't do it during the day, so they want to train after work. They could also start a podcast about issues they see frequently and what requires attention. A podcast would be helpful to keep us all apprised about what's going on and/or offline training for those people who can't train during the week."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 177 reviews while ThreatLocker Protect is ranked 26th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8, while ThreatLocker Protect is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatLocker Protect writes "Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online". SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Wazuh, whereas ThreatLocker Protect is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Huntress, GravityZone Business Security and Fortinet FortiClient. See our SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. ThreatLocker Protect report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.