We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Dynatrace has a user-friendly interface, easy deployment, good scalability, AI capabilities for incident alert automation, and offers a Kubernetes module for topology visualization. Even though the solution is expensive compared to competitors, it provides good value for its cost and is a great choice for companies seeking a user-friendly and scalable solution.
"I like the event management part."
"The most valuable features of BMC TrueSight Operations Management are the blackouts and event management."
"The event management part of TrueSight Operations Management, in my experience, is probably the best in the market. You have endless flexibility. You can build your own rules, you have the MRL language, and you can implement any kind of logic on the alerts. It may be correlation, abstraction, or executing something as a result of the alerts. You have almost the whole range of options available for event management using the available customization."
"I believe that the ease of use and UI is great"
"The tool is flexible enough to be customized based on customer requirements."
"The solution's event management capabilities are fantastic. We do a best of breed. If, on the network side, they use a different tool, we pull all that data in so that we have a single console. It's kind of like the monitor of monitors. We're able to aggregate all the different types of data sets, whether it's log data, app data, OS data, infrastructure data, or network data. We're able to aggregate all those events and then correlate and be able to say we're having an event."
"TSOM's ability to consolidate alerts into a single location and provide filtering of alerts is great."
"The Event Management is outstanding; still is the most interesting part of the product."
"The PurePaths are valuable because that's where somebody who is a non-developer can figure out where the problem is and send appropriate PurePaths, clean charts, or even the link to the developer. The developer can then look at it and figure out exactly where the problem is, this is the piece of code that took the longest time, and then resolve it."
"The most valuable features for me are the dashboard panels because they enable you to monitor multiple applications in one single site."
"Real-time alerts allow us to address issues as they happen."
"Logs files for JVM transactions help to debug most of the failures."
"We got firsthand RCA as soon as we finished implementation."
"If you look in the APM sector, it is a very nice package to install."
"We have used PurePath data (response times) to improve and tune application performance."
"Dynatrace has allowed us to pinpoint quickly any pain points our clients experience with our applications and respond accordingly."
"In our company, we faced some issues with the solution’s application endpoint, IP, and the physical location of the transactions."
"The solution should improve predicting events and flaws in service. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."
"The pricing could be better."
"I definitely would like to see more improvement in the self-diagnostics. I need to know when anything is not working or collecting, long before our customer finds it."
"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."
"More modules for less popular applications and better documentation."
"The solution could improve its price."
"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."
"Add support for Ruby."
"It needs improvement with proprietary protocols for the DC RUM part."
"Include network monitoring in more detail for deep dive analytics of network components."
"The pricing of the product could be improved."
"The AppMon 6.5 is problematic in configuring. It is little finicky. When we configured the JVM, it did not work."
"It needs education and training to ensure you get the full value of your purchase. Maybe add in a certification for Dynatrace."
"It needs container log monitoring."
"We have some issues with react user sessions."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 9th in AIOps with 49 reviews while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in AIOps with 340 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix, New Relic and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence), whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Dynatrace report.
See our list of best AIOps vendors and best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.