We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and InfoVista 5View NetFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."I believe that the ease of use and UI is great"
"The solution's event management capabilities are fantastic. We do a best of breed. If, on the network side, they use a different tool, we pull all that data in so that we have a single console. It's kind of like the monitor of monitors. We're able to aggregate all the different types of data sets, whether it's log data, app data, OS data, infrastructure data, or network data. We're able to aggregate all those events and then correlate and be able to say we're having an event."
"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."
"TSOM's ability to consolidate alerts into a single location and provide filtering of alerts is great."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Signature baselines, which have allowed us to fine tune many of our events and significantly reduce the number of events generated."
"The Event Management is outstanding; still is the most interesting part of the product."
"The ability of this platform to monitor the very diverse assets that we maintain around the world is its most valuable feature... We support a vast array of manufacturers' equipment, like HP, IBM, Cisco, Dell, EMC, Hitachi... We can do it all with [this] one [solution]."
"InfoVista 5View NetFlow allows us to control the application layer and manage API connections, i.e. Facebook logins or whatever other third-party API services we require."
"The product must provide more AI capabilities."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could improve the reporting."
"One of the things that the TrueSight environment is missing is some of the HA abilities. The data collection server called the ISM doesn't really have the HA functionality or workload balancing. It was missing from the previous product as well. It's missing redundancy."
"It would be better if the initial setup and deployment were more straightforward."
"The solution should improve predicting events and flaws in service. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."
"The solution is a little obsolete."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"The one piece that I would love to see is a general-purpose, configurable agent which would be a framework that you can deploy on anything, whether it be Java or anything else. It would allow you to easily deploy it on a platform that they support."
"A little bit better documentation on the details is needed because this subject is not easy sometimes to understand, which limits the capability of the software."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 49 reviews while InfoVista 5View NetFlow is ranked 63rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while InfoVista 5View NetFlow is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InfoVista 5View NetFlow writes "Great for service discovery and load balancing and enables us to monitor the traffic flow". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas InfoVista 5View NetFlow is most compared with Catchpoint.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.