We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Postman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a good API management product."
"The most valuable features are API development and API management."
"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager's most valuable aspect is it has plenty of features."
"Offers good integration and flexibility."
"The security features are good. It's easy to configure the end-to-end integration with existing applications."
"Overall, the platform is pretty good, I cannot say which one specific feature is good. The idea of an API manager is really interesting."
"I believe the API connectivity within the cloud marketplace is most valuable."
"MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is a great solution. I like it very much because of its speed of delivery and because it allows API-led integration."
"Postman is useful for API testing."
"The product is easy to implement."
"The API testing features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the user interface because it provides a clear space for the URL, headers, body, prerequisites, and tests."
"The solution has a great user interface and collection of features."
"The scalability is good."
"The developers put the API in a common workspace which is a nice feature. It makes things much easier and faster to start testing."
"It is simple, easy to use and a good tool."
"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager can improve some of the gateway features. We could use some more customization in creating rules. A lot of the policies are related to the APIs rather than the client. If I want to apply a policy based on a client that is not available."
"The pricing is quite expensive. It should be adjusted to make it more affordable for users."
"The initial setup is very complex."
"I would like to see MuleSoft expand the range of APIs you can manage with it beyond HTTP, GIPC, and others."
"They should provide training and development programs to enable the skills and capabilities of users."
"The solution is missing a monetization module."
"MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower."
"An area for improvement in MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is the process of applying policies because it's manual. It would be great if MuleSoft could make the process easier, particularly by automating it."
"I would like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"Postman needs more advanced data-driven testing."
"Integration should be improved with our continuation system because we use Azure DevOps separately."
"They should integrate the solution with one of the CRM solutions."
"Postman could be improved by providing options for performance testing of APIs."
"The performance needs to be improved."
"The reporting could be better. It should give you a detailed PDF report after you run a test."
"The scalability of the solution can be improved."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 49 reviews while Postman is ranked 9th in API Management with 52 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while Postman is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Postman writes "Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Runscope. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. Postman report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.