We performed a comparison between Acumatica and SAP S/4HANA Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The way everything integrated well with everything else was most valuable. We had one solution for everything, from the first phone call down to follow-up visits for wholesale callers and for just regular purchases."
"This solution supports multiple branches."
"I like the SAP offerings and the standard best practices included in the SAP S/4HANA Cloud version."
"Finance aspects of it and transportation management, asset management, and inventory management are valuable."
"The most valuable features of SAP S/4HANA Cloud are the ease of use from the cloud, CapEx analysis report, and everything being connected together well."
"Managing the server and taking advantage of the services provided by SAP itself is the most valuable feature."
"What I like the most about SAP S4HANA is how reliable and powerful it is."
"Both standard and customized integrations work well with no issues."
"The manufacturing area is a good feature."
"SAP is an extremely powerful ERP. In my past company, we used it on a massive large scale, and it was amazing."
"We should be able to personalize it for the company. There should be more customization of the pages so that they seem more like a company rather than as an outside company. We should be able to change company images and things like that and do this kind of personalization."
"For support, we go through a distributor, and the support we receive from them is much better than what we would from Acumatica directly. When we went to Acumatica support directly, we were not happy with it."
"The solution doesn't have features to break down the structure for multiple people in the project."
"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."
"Customer service and support's response time is really long."
"The only thing I would improve is the overall user experience, particularly the mobile app. S/4HANA is a powerful, scalable platform, but the user experience isn't positive. It's a bit complex. The look and feel aren't attractive, and the mobile experience isn't great."
"SAP S4HANA Cloud's production planning screens could be improved."
"They can improve the interface. It has a client-server kind of interface, which is kind of old."
"The implementation time for S/4HANA Cloud could be reduced."
"Analytics could be improved."
"The solution could improve by adding a planning model, such as BPC. Additionally, if we need to make changes in the profit center it has to be done manually. It is not connected to the cost center."
Acumatica is ranked 6th in Cloud ERP with 3 reviews while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is ranked 3rd in Cloud ERP with 41 reviews. Acumatica is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Acumatica writes "Provided one solution for everything and housed everything for us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA Cloud writes "A valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance their overall performance and competitiveness in the digital era". Acumatica is most compared with NetSuite ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, HubSpot CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas SAP S/4HANA Cloud is most compared with SAP Business ByDesign, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP Business One, IFS Cloud Platform and Plex Manufacturing Cloud ERP. See our Acumatica vs. SAP S/4HANA Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud ERP vendors.
We monitor all Cloud ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.