We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"Plugin: Connecting Grafana to multiple APIs of leading monitoring tools and alerting tools."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"Grafana's built-in integration with third-party tools, databases, and MQs is an amazing feature."
"The solution can scale well."
"What I found most valuable in Grafana is that it has a lot of integrations and features that I need for data processing and visualization."
"We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"There is room for improvement when using multiple dashboards because they can become complicated to keep track of and use."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
"The service dashboard is very hard and needs improvement."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"They should improve the functioning of its editing tool."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
"The solution should include online support."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our Akamai mPulse vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.