We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The price could be improved."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"It should give better control over account management."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and TIBCO BusinessWorks, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
