We performed a comparison between Camunda and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 21st in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Ivanti Automation, OpenText Operations Orchestration, ServiceNow Orchestration and BizTalk Server. See our Camunda vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
