We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and OpenText Operations Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."
"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."
"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."
"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."
"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
More OpenText Operations Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 21st in Process Automation with 2 reviews while OpenText Operations Orchestration is ranked 19th in Process Automation with 24 reviews. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while OpenText Operations Orchestration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Orchestration writes "HP OO blows away the competition, but has its fair share of flaws". Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas OpenText Operations Orchestration is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Control-M, Camunda, BigFix and Appian. See our Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.