We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and ServiceNow Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Orchestration is commonly utilized by major corporations. The process of linking methods in ServiceNow, known as the RTS chain to parent methods, is executed seamlessly and efficiently. It's quite impressive and significant in its impact."
"The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations."
"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."
"The product has a flexible interface for development."
"The iTerm suite is also crucial for visibility and optimization."
"The data visualization is good."
"The solution effectively automates business processes."
"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to include improvements in a similar manner that they did in Sweden."
"Frequent upgrades may negatively impact the performance of instances. Therefore, for now, I don't recommend any additional upgrades."
"We cannot perform GUI automation using the tool."
"There can be gaps in integration."
"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."
"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."
"From my space, the only thing that I can say is the spinning up with Google Cloud Services."
"I would like a user experience module to be added."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 21st in Process Automation with 2 reviews while ServiceNow Orchestration is ranked 13th in Process Automation with 12 reviews. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while ServiceNow Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Orchestration writes "Fastest upgrading technology in the market currently". Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, OpenText Operations Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas ServiceNow Orchestration is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Control-M, Nintex Process Platform and Hyland OnBase. See our Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.