We performed a comparison between Cegid and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The master data where most of the reports were run from was the most valuable. We were quite satisfied with this module."
"They have some interesting features in the learning space."
"We are satisfied with the reporting by SAP HCM."
"It simplifies everything for human capital management, and all users can do self-enrollment for leaves and those kinds of things. The employee self-service feature is quite a powerful feature for me. You can install it on your mobile phone or iPad and do your employee service activity there."
"When you maintain your data in SAP, you can generate any kind of HR report with one click."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"We've found that the solution has the capability to scale."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"There needs to be a renovation of the interface and functionalities of the talent management modules."
"The breadth of functionality offered by SAP HCM comes at a cost."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"The setup comes with a set of challenges as well."
"SAP HCM has many different channels for communication with the consultants which makes it complex. There are delays when there is a problem."
"On the personnel administration side, it's very difficult to do custom development."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"The talent modules are lacking in HCM, so I would recommend switching to SuccessFactors for talent management, but HCM excels at time management and payroll."
Cegid is ranked 23rd in Talent Management with 12 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Talent Management with 46 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, BambooHR and UKG, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and Sage People. See our Cegid vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.