We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and SAP Mobile Secure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."A great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution."
"It is a stable solution."
"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"The ability to (somewhat) manage full Windows 10 computers including EXE-based or MSI-based application deployments using Azure Active Directory as Identity."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"Compliance and the policies that can be set are the most valuable features."
"Internet-based access with security is what I have found to be most valuable. It is also a stable and scalable solution."
"We can reconfigure a client’s setup remotely with minimal effort."
"The cloud dashboard's analytics data is particularly valuable, giving me insights into user activities and making it easy to track and manage devices."
"It's robust, and we like the device availability, ease of purchase, and supplier stock availability."
"The solution is easy to use and support."
"It has facilitated zero-touch authorization events for our employees and their devices. Furthermore, Meraki Systems Manager plays a vital role in securing our notebooks."
"It’s helped us manage our endpoints."
"The most valuable features of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) are its ability to do geofencing for devices, manage thousands of devices with only a push of a button, and quick application deployment in seconds. It's amazing. For example, in an education scenario, you can deploy an application update for thousands of iPads in two clicks."
"The most significant benefit is that the deployment is quick and painless. You don't need a specialized IT department to implement and scale the network. It's easy to maintain, too. It only requires one or two network administrators."
"Everything is available to you from your handset."
"The difficulty of the the roll out is surprisingly difficult considering this product is supposed to be an integrated part of the 365 suite."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"Regarding mobile devices, Intune is good, but there are other services that I would say are ahead of Intune from an administration and reporting point of view."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"The add-ons must be integrated into the solution."
"The pricing can be expensive if you are not combining it with other products."
"The reports that are generated aren't so great. They don't give a lot of meaning so far, but that could be down to user knowledge than the actual reporting side of things. I'm not a big user of it, but I was a bigger user of MaaS360, and we used to be able to run weekly and monthly reports. In the case of any deviations. we'd get a warning immediately. That's not so easy to do or to get in place for Intune. This could be just a user issue, but when I compare both, that's the only thing that's lacking for me."
"In my opinion, the equipment availabilities and competitive pricings could be improved."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a four out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. It is more difficult."
"Security could be improved, and there could be more features that enable you to customize the end customer solution."
"It doesn't seem to be able to establish some VPN tunnels with other devices in a particular way that such as an ASA can do for us."
"It would be beneficial to have better integration with other OS."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"There are problems with the connection on the client side, and the app that was deployed could be better."
"Integration with other tools, such as, ConnectWise Automate."
"We would like it if SAP could integrate the transactional mode as well so that users can perform transactional jobs by mobile-only."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while SAP Mobile Secure is ranked 26th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while SAP Mobile Secure is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Secure writes "Easy to use and set up with easy mobile access to reports". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and SOTI MobiControl, whereas SAP Mobile Secure is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
