We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and DX Unified Infrastructure Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The capability where not only the traditional SNMP information is captured but also the netflow data; who is consuming the data on the WAN, and voice-related information, is helpful. The voice quality makes it very easy for first- and second-line operators to see where the issue is, and who is impacted."
"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels... are all very intuitive."
"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"The tool helps us understand network performance."
"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."
"It saves time having it all on one place, so you do not have to jump around from different tools and try to merge the data. It is already done for you."
"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."
"It is reliable when it comes to monitoring."
"Latest version of tool comes integrated with Jaspersoft reporting solution, giving excellent reports."
"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."
"The real value is our being able to pull all the historic data that we need in order to gather every little metric and nuanced piece of information from a given device, a given piece of infrastructure, in order for us to generate alerts."
"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."
"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."
"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."
"It needs role-based administration."
"Policies could be improved."
"Some of the individual report views, the way some of the columns sort, there's room for improvement in giving us more flexibility in being able to sort reports based, for example, on what columns the metrics fall under."
"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."
"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."
"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"They need to continue to advance the filter capabilities, and provide more input fields."
"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."
"The UIM has no features through goods and services yet. "
"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."
"The dashboards need to be improved."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX Performance Management is ranked 35th in Network Monitoring Software with 31 reviews while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 36th in Network Monitoring Software with 120 reviews. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum and SolarWinds AppOptics, whereas DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with ManageEngine OpManager, SCOM, DX SaaS, DX Spectrum and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. See our DX Performance Management vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
