We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have seen a return on investment from F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. It provided access at a time when we didn't have it."
"The tool is reliable and easy to configure."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"F5 BIG-IP APM is relatively easy to use."
"The load balancing features are valuable."
"The portal access was very good."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual IP creation. It's our most frequently used feature."
"The product allows us to create customized portals for your users."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally."
"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better"
"Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The solution is quite costly."
"The solution’s GUI looks very old."
"The technical support’s response time must be improved."
"The price of this product can be improved."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is ranked 6th in Access Management with 13 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Access Management. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is rated 8.2, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) writes " Facilitates packet inspection, modification, and offloading and offers visibility and troubleshooting capabilities, allowing for pre-production server testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is most compared with Citrix Gateway, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Ivanti Connect Secure and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and CyberArk Identity. See our F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
