We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"Having a single sign-on to all our applications."
"Other than Okta being an easy and awesome integration tool, one of the best features it has is the provisioning and deprovisioning, which makes management way easier. You don't need to be too technical to understand how it works."
"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"The only aspect in which it can be improved is that the interface could be cleaner. I found this even when I was trying to do my certification exam because the certification is hands-on. You find yourself fumbling around a little bit to find simple things. This happens even when you start to get familiar with the product."
"The error logging could be improved. Okta doesn't provide enough details when you are troubleshooting an issue. It's often difficult to fix it from our end, so we always need additional support from Okta."
"The pricing could be improved."
"In some setup cases, there are issues with attributes not going in properly."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 57 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Auth0. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.