We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Offers a diversity of features."
"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."
"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"The stability is very good. I have never had an issue with it over the three years that I have been using it."
"The OneView Global Dashboard is very user-friendly and it can be used for monitoring the power consumption and temperature of the data center and racks."
"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "
"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."
"By being able to deploy servers very quickly and rapidly, we can respond to any business requirement needed."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"The main problem that we run into, as far as stability goes, is when something loses its profile. Sometimes it requires jumping through a number of "hoops" to really get it back."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."
Earn 20 points
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 61st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp and Zabbix, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Goliath Performance Monitor vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.