We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"The level of customization for data imports and role modeling, because it helps to integrate faster, support easier and let it reuse the organization role structure."
"The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle."
"It is simple and easy to implement."
"Good life cycle management, segregation of duties, and analytics features."
"IdentityIQ's best features are the hassle-free user experience and security."
"Provides good authorization and authentication system functionality."
"It provides a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities. You don't have to do too much custom development like other solutions such as Microsoft or NetIQ. It also has a lot of out-of-the-box connectors for different sources, directories, databases, etc. Its cloud version is working very well, and its pricing is okay. Its value for money is fine for most of the customers. It is also very flexible. They have frequent new releases and patches for fixing errors and things like that."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The solution, in general, is quite expensive."
"Needs to focus on automation wherein provisioning of work can be improved and access certification should be automated without the intervention from a manager for approval."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its customization. It should also incorporate some standardized tools for implementation."
"There is a need for further enhancements, specifically in the multifactor authentication capabilities."
"The user interface could be slightly improved. It could be made simpler and more user-friendly, however, it is good enough right now."
"It is not readily available and cannot be downloaded from the net."
"It is too technical. You need really good technical skills in Java and other technologies, which are hard to find. If they can make it easier so that things can be done with a few clicks, it will be great."
"We have had a lot of service breaks because of the lack of support."
Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor and ManageEngine ADManager Plus, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager. See our Imanami GroupID vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.