We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for MDM and Sophos Mobile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Mobile device management is most valuable."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"The many policies available in Microsoft Intune for managing our devices are valuable."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The key benefit of Intune is its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"The ability to push applications on devices is valuable. You do not have to manually install applications one by one. If you like to use ten different applications, you do not have to manually go and download them one by one. Intune can compile a package for you, and then you can just push them from the admin center."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"It is user-friendly, and the performance is also good. It is a convenient product"
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The most valuable feature is the mobile device management capability. You can easily manage all of your mobile devices."
"The solution provides us with data protection."
"They always add more features to this product."
"I like the level of interaction that the product offers with the other products in our company's environment."
"The initial setup process is straightforward and fast."
"The security features work well."
"The utmost importance lies in mobile security and its performance."
"The solution is quite user-friendly."
"There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks."
"The reports that are generated aren't so great. They don't give a lot of meaning so far, but that could be down to user knowledge than the actual reporting side of things. I'm not a big user of it, but I was a bigger user of MaaS360, and we used to be able to run weekly and monthly reports. In the case of any deviations. we'd get a warning immediately. That's not so easy to do or to get in place for Intune. This could be just a user issue, but when I compare both, that's the only thing that's lacking for me."
"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"Areas for improvement in Intune include expanding support beyond Samsung devices to accommodate other Android manufacturers like Redmi and Motorola."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The features of Sophos Mobile could improve. The way the system works together could be better. Additionally, the integration with other Sophos products could improve."
"In terms of what could be improved, the initial configuration and setup of the environment could probably be made a little bit easier. There are so many pieces that go into it. Intune is absolutely insane and Sophos is better, but it still is a bit complex to get it all set up correctly."
"We would like to see graphics showing the use of each device."
"It could be more secure."
"The setup should be made easier."
"They continue to work on integration with mobile device management and mobile security. They are improving the protection but I think that the capabilities still need to be enhanced."
"The product does not work well in iOS."
"There may be necessary adjustments that need to be made because we are facing certain restrictions within the work profile."
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 5 reviews while Sophos Mobile doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 13 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4, while Sophos Mobile is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Mobile writes "Stable product with central administration to manage device security ". Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, IBM MaaS360 and BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, whereas Sophos Mobile is most compared with Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, VMware Workspace ONE and Lookout. See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Sophos Mobile report.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
