We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Tanium XEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."For our office workers who are not based in Norway, when we order the PC, we can do some of the settings for them. These are standardized settings. We can set them up exactly as they are in Norway so that they're the same."
"A great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution."
"The most valuable features are the ones that make sure that the deployment is of a standard operating system and the Zero Touch deployment, which is very useful. This allows users to have an out of box experience."
"Intune provides full endpoint visibility and IT control across device platforms. You can individualize it for your company with the Intune Company Portal app."
"The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution."
"The product has eased the deployment of Microsoft apps to the devices. We can manage it properly. We can control it and push the updates. Another company helped us with the deployment. However, we can do it internally."
"Its protection policies are most valuable. It protects mobile devices as well as individual apps. It is pretty scalable, and its documentation is also pretty good. It is also pretty straightforward to deploy."
"The security-related tools are excellent; these features allow us to secure devices, lock them down, and ensure compliance."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"We use the product to know about our assets and manage remote support."
"The solution is time-saving and resource-saving."
"Identification of gaps and filling the gaps with updates are most valuable. We are able to identify known updates or missing updates and then update."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central is stable."
"The solution's stability is better than the other solutions in the market."
"It's a complete product that allows you to remote troubleshoot, has an inventory of systems."
"The most important feature we found to be useful in the COVID situation is the secure connection, which gives the IT support staff the ability to seamlessly connect with the users remotely and in a secure way."
"The solution's technical support is very responsive."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"Sometimes, updating a client policy is very difficult. This needs to be improved."
"It should be simplified. I've worked with many different mobile device management solutions, and Intune is one of the more complex ones. It could be more simplified, and some of it is related to the wording that is being used, such as a configuration profile versus a policy. They really should have had different names to make it less confusing."
"There could be more wizard-driven policy development or creation. Some of the policies can get quite complex. If they have a wizard that assists the administrators in creating the policy, that will be a great job."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"Areas for improvement in Intune include expanding support beyond Samsung devices to accommodate other Android manufacturers like Redmi and Motorola."
"There is room for improvement in integration and security as well."
"It's the granularity: 'Is your firewall on? Is BitLocker on?' It's not amazing granularity. But I've looked into other products, like Duo, and they're all similar."
"Not many things are needed for improvement, everything seems to be great as it is. One thing that would be good to have would be the ability to add MDM to a tablet running Android 5.0 using the EMM Token Enrollment. If we wanted to add MDM to an older tablet, we just have to go the "long route" to get it added."
"The performance sometimes lags a bit because the solution is demanding on system resources."
"Tech support is mediocre at best."
"Documentation could improve so we don't need to create the support requests first."
"Improvement should be done as per customer requirements."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"We would like to see options for deploying Microsoft 365 accounts into Outlook. For now we only can use it to deploy exchange accounts. Also we would like to see an option do decline Windows 7 ESU patches in a bulk."
"Computer imaging is powerful but breaks frequently. The reason for this breaking is not clear and requires heavy amounts of attention to keep operational. There is a lot of room for this tool to do more but the reliability of this process should be focused on first to ensure core competencies are being fixed before more features are added."
"There are some bugs in the product. The tool needs to improve in the area of reporting."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 3rd in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 59 reviews while Tanium XEM is ranked 13th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Tanium XEM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium XEM writes "Offers reliability and efficiency to users". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Tanium XEM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Adaptiva and Ivanti Neurons for MDM.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.