We performed a comparison between NetSuite OneWorld and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has helped us save money by reducing the number of people needed for delivery, finance, and customer service. We now better understand our stock and purchases, and our sales team can access information without constantly communicating with delivery."
"NetSuite is a great solution, fast to bring up and makes everyone's life easier."
"The solution is user-friendly and flexible."
"Utilizes best practices that are simple to implement."
"Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"NetSuite OneWorld is a single instance that allows you to do different business functions, such as reporting, order-to-cash, design-build, and procure-to-pay. This feature is what's most valuable in the solution."
"Lowers costs, produces higher efficiencies, while maintaining a leaner staff and produces advanced financials."
"The most valuable feature is the inbuilt standards included in SAP that customers can adopt easily. Also offers to customize it based on the specific requirements."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"One of the things I like about it is its well-integrated and secure nature."
"SAP S4HANA version 1909 is stable. We have not gone live with 2020 yet."
"It is really fast. It is also very stable."
"SAP S/4HANA is the preferred database because of its scalability, faster accessibility, compatibility, and other well-suited features for large data sets."
"I have found the most valuable features are the interface, which is very good for all users, and the database performance is good."
"The functionality of SAP S4HANA is very good when comparing it to others, such as Oracle, Microsoft, and other ERP solutions."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"Certain analytics features are missing that I've come to expect from other systems. Additionally, there are occasional issues with data accuracy that need to be addressed. Overall, deeper analytics capabilities would greatly improve the tool's usefulness for me."
"Needs time entry for billable employees."
"There is not a 20 year pedigree of pharma experience in the NetSuite channel. While there are many of these CMO Pharma companies rapidly moving to NetSuite, there are few consultants with true pharma experience. Those who have experience are stretched pretty thin."
"I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core."
"I hope NetSuite OneWorld introduces features like support for different pricing models, including packaging options, and improved production planning tools in the future."
"Project collaboration through Dashboard Business Management and Relations Management is easy to perform, but it does need to be worked on as it is difficult for customers, suppliers, and internal users to use."
"The Project Management User Interface is lacking."
"The user interface should be much more convenient and user-friendly."
"The solution could have a better user experience. However, they are working a lot on the user experience and they have come up with various applications, such as mobile applications. This was lacking over the last two years."
"The customer service and support are average. There is room for improvement in response time."
"The common issues being raised right now by the end users are mostly related to the usability."
"There should be a place where I can get the best available applications in one place. Currently, Fiori applications are available in different tiles on the dashboards. If anyone wants to check the financial, sales, and inventory reporting in one place, it is not possible in Fiori. We would have to develop a custom Fiori application. If that feature can be incorporated into the standard Fiori, it will be helpful for us."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"Technical support has been declining. They aren't as responsive as they used to be."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 14th in ERP with 14 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 67 reviews. NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our NetSuite OneWorld vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.