We performed a comparison between NinjaOne and TOPdesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."NinjaOne's best feature is its monitoring."
"The installation is easy, it only took two minutes."
"The most important aspect of this tool is the security it provides our company."
"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."
"Good at managing updates and for remote support."
"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."
"The solution's most valuable feature is related to its remote access...I know that NinjaOne's technical support is good."
"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."
"The most valuable feature of TOPdesk is the reports."
"It is an easy-to-use solution."
"When it comes to implementing new features, they listen to what their customers want via a suggestion forum that they have."
"Change management is the most critical feature."
"This solution has provided me with a well-defined process and interaction, compared to my previous tool, GLPI."
"The most valuable feature of TOPdesk is its ease of use if you have implemented it in the right way. If you're not implementing it in the right way, then it's very difficult."
"Its ITSM approach is quite useful."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the incident management module."
"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."
"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."
"I want NinjaOne to improve the reports."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."
"The reporting is lackluster. NinjaOne is great for maintaining systems, but it's hard to use it to understand the state that systems are in without going in and mining the information myself. I rate the reporting two out of 10."
"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."
"It can have more integrations with third-party providers, such as Deep Instinct. They do partner with certain antivirus or remote access tool partners, but they can increase their portfolio to have more choices."
"The graphical user interface could be improved."
"Change management implementation, facility management, and making reservations on assets can be improved."
"It is time-consuming to add new users."
"The solution's change management could be better."
"One of the disadvantages of TOPdesk is the reporting tool. It is very poor and not in real-time. You do not always receive the correct information."
"All companies have processes that need to be adjusted. When you have a change, you need to name it, and many companies have a set of changes you can use. It would be helpful if there were more space in TOPdesk to name the change or use metadata to record the kinds of changes."
"If I open a ticket on the infrastructure team, I can't move it to the financial team for them to manage the ticket."
"An operator is also a user but requires creating two different records."
"This solution is modular so you only buy what you need, but I prefer what some companies are doing where they include everything in the package."
NinjaOne is ranked 7th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 15 reviews while TOPdesk is ranked 16th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 8 reviews. NinjaOne is rated 8.0, while TOPdesk is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of NinjaOne writes "A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TOPdesk writes "Provides good technical support services, but its reporting feature needs improvement". NinjaOne is most compared with Atera, N-able N-central, Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate and Kaseya VSA, whereas TOPdesk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Freshdesk, BMC Helix ITSM and Zendesk. See our NinjaOne vs. TOPdesk report.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.