We performed a comparison between PeopleFluent Talent Management and SAP SuccessFactors based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."
"This solution can be used for reporting related to employee information and contacts"
"It's a uniform user interface."
"The most valuable features of SAP SuccessFactors are onboarding, recruiting, marketing, and performance."
"SAP SuccessFactors is stable, we have not found any bugs or glitches."
"I love SAP, and I like SuccessFactors...I think most users prefer SuccessFactors as they become more comfortable with it."
"The interface is really useful and it's very easy to combine different information. For example, we can easily get reports that we need. It's very easy to create reports."
"In terms of user experience, it is quite good."
"The solution is scalable. We have about 1,300 people using the solution."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"SAP SuccessFactors' pricing structure could be improved."
"The user experience could be simplified."
"SuccessFactors could be improved by making it usable on mobile and making its features less rigid."
"SAP SuccessFactors needs to improve the LMS and performance management."
"Everything, including the provisioning dependency, should be moved to the instance, and coding should be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible, coding should be minimized, and everything should be a drag-and-drop."
"There is room for improvement in licensing model."
"Its overall integration and user experience can be improved. SuccessFactors is a system that is built out of three different systems. The elements part was bought from Plateau, and the original performance dialogue was built by SuccessFactors itself. After that, SAP bought it, and it hasn't improved in the last few years. SuccessFactors is a perfect tool if you use it the way it is meant to be, but if you start building custom sessions and try to use it differently, then it is a total mess. It is not agile. It is like an old Mastodon truck or whatever. We don't have the Employee Central and Competence Management modules. Our company made the choice to not implement the Employee Central module. We also didn't implement the Competence Management module. We use the learning module to do some competence management, but I am not that fond of it. It would have been best to have the whole suite. SAP should never sell this without selling the whole suite because it just doesn't work. The biggest gain for me would be having the possibility of doing strategic personnel planning and managing internal mobility. If it could be used for social purposes, such as creating communities and connecting with media channels, that would be perfect. It should also have the possibilities for local admin and agile product development."
"The process for long modules needs to be improved, because compared to how it's done with a competitor (Meta4), the competitor's process was simpler."
More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
PeopleFluent Talent Management is ranked 27th in Talent Management while SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 90 reviews. PeopleFluent Talent Management is rated 6.6, while SAP SuccessFactors is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of PeopleFluent Talent Management writes "A flexible solution with superb automation capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Offers many useful modules and integrations, and helps companies adhere to best practices". PeopleFluent Talent Management is most compared with PeopleSoft, whereas SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG. See our PeopleFluent Talent Management vs. SAP SuccessFactors report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.