We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."
"This is a user friendly solution."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that there are various test case templates and test artifact maintenance."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"Better prediction of text."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."
"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."
"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."
"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". PractiTest is most compared with Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, TFS, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.