We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."
"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."
"It is scalable enough. We have over a hundred end users using it."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the SAP Fiori application."
"It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool."
"It's helped with business aspects and improved material planning and RMA processes."
"A robust product with integration between all modules."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"SAP S/4HANA is the preferred database because of its scalability, faster accessibility, compatibility, and other well-suited features for large data sets."
"The solution's new UI called Fiori is user friendly."
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."
"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."
"The two things that need to be improved are price and customization."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"I would like to see the AI included to help from a data standpoint."
"It is simple to implement SAP S4HANA. If you are already in this type of environment, then the transition is not very complex. However, if you do not then it can be difficult."
"We would like to see more DevOps capabilities in the future."
"SAP S4HANA is not suitable for all-size companies. If you have a small company there are better fit solutions for your needs."
"The resource usage could be improved - it's memory-hungry, so mid-range servers struggle to run it."
QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 67 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, NetSuite ERP and Epicor ERP, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.