We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."This solution is much more user-friendly than past solutions I have used."
"InsightVM offers a robust platform for identifying, prioritizing, and addressing vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure."
"This solution's most useful feature is that it is entirely a single-page application."
"The most valuable feature is the site scanning, where we can provide a complete subnet and what it is we need to scan on those devices."
"The solution works well."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"Patch management is the only missing feature I can think of. Rapid7 detects vulnerabilities, but it should also help you manage patches."
"The team needs to improve the speed and focus on the new bandwidth feed. Sometimes, it takes a while to scan, especially with new updates."
"Technical support does not respond quickly."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"Reporting could be expanded."
"InsightVM is getting a little stale and is in danger of falling behind its competitors."
"A definite improvement would be to make it easier to run ad-hoc scans without needing to assign the asset to a site or group."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Qualys VMDR.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.