We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its dashboards."
"Rapid7 have a good distribution network with good support and market presence."
"It's easy to use. It's fast, it's a powerful easy to access tool."
"It's very scalable."
"This solution's most useful feature is that it is entirely a single-page application."
"The performance is good."
"I like Rapid7's scan optimization options."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"The product is easy to use."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"The team needs to improve the speed and focus on the new bandwidth feed. Sometimes, it takes a while to scan, especially with new updates."
"There are end-user needs and expectations that are being overlooked in the development that could be addressed by appointing a customer advisory board."
"It would be great to have a mobile application client. Currently, you have to use a mobile web browser on a device, but it is not similar to the desktop web browser in terms of user experience. It would be nice to have a mobile application to access the platform."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"Their customer support should be improved, and the effectiveness of scans also needs to be improved."
"Rapid7 InsightVM, has impressive capabilities, especially when it comes to managing video equipment. However, we've noticed that Rapid7 also offers a cloud solution called CloudSec, and we don't have that. We think it would be better if InsightVM had all the features for both on-premise and cloud management."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"The price could be lower."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"The product is a bit expensive."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Orca Security. See our Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.