We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, OneTrust and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The price could be lower."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
