We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"The initial setup was straightforward and it does not take long to complete."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"The best feature is the customization."
"The product is stable."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The support team responds fast."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Camunda, Nintex Process Platform and Appian. See our Apache Airflow vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.