We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."
"The product is very cheap and stable."
"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."
"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."
"It's reliable, configurable and generally secure."
"It is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."
"Microsoft .NET Framework’s most valuable features are web application development, RESTful services development, security, performance, and less memory footprint."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"Basically, .NET is simply is the easiest programming language to use, based on my experience."
"The most valuable feature is the financial accounting."
"The solution is not limited in storage, is customizable and simple to use."
"Given that it's cross-platform right now, where you can use it on Windows and Mac, that is the single most significant feature that has resulted in wider adoption of .NET."
"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions."
"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."
"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."
"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."
"Its stability could be better."
"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."
"The interface has room for improvement."
"The major issue occurs with ports. So, I would like to see easier port management."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"I would like to see a better response time from the technical support."
"If AI could be incorporated in Microsoft .NET Framework it would be helpful."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"The integration could improve in Microsoft .NET Framework."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 22 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Has good security, speed and traffic handling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Zend PHP Engine and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our Apache Web Server vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.