We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"The solution is quite stable."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"The addition of generics to handle common functionality across types, and the more recent upgrade of the dataset to the Entity Framework, has cut development time drastically, while increasing quality and confidence between builds."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality."
"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."
"Proven solution with valuable customization."
"The .NET Framework is easier to use because it provides a wide range of libraries."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"One thing that could be improved is the tooling and IDE for .NET in non-Windows environments like Mac."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.