We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"Automation functions, image based backup, and the ability to instantly recover anything from files to databases."
"Mounting recent backups to create new servers rather than cloning servers in VMware drastically cut down required time."
"Rubrik is a very scalable and high-performing backup restore solution."
"The most valuable feature has been the Live Mount feature."
"Rubrik can also serve as a secondary host for emergency recoveries."
"The live mounting and compatibility of different operating systems is great."
"The solution's technical support team is very responsive and proactive."
"Rubrik is an easy and automatic solution that needs no manual intervention."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would like to see more security features."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"Lacks availability in a NFR format of virtual appliances to test them in public cloud environment."
"The product’s user interface needs improvement."
"Rubrik needs to continue to listen to their customers and what they want/need, not just care about money and the bottom line."
"I don't like Rubrik's user interface because it's not intuitive, and I find it hard to get the information I need."
"The solution needs to be more secure and needs to better protect against ransomware."
"Global management of multiple systems is lacking, as is reporting across multiple installed units."
"The price of Rubrik is too high, especially when you are considering a change in the total backup solution."
"The licensing cost is quite high. That is something that needs to be worked out, because so many times it happens that the team does not have the budget or there are other issues at that time. Cost has become an important factor in deciding whether to continue with the Rubrik solution."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 86 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Automates the backup and recovery process, reducing manual human errors and global search allows for granular recoveries". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Azure Backup and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.