We performed a comparison between Bizagi and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."
"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."
"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."
"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"The approval process is simple."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"It is much easier to develop applications with the product’s IDE."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"I really like the one-click publish feature in OutSystems. In other development tools/languages, it's not as easy. I also like how easily I can manage all my projects in one place."
"The technical support is perfect."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of OutSystems are the user interface, the flexibility to quickly integrate with almost anything in the system, and the ability to connect with databases."
"One thing that I don't like very much is related to integration: we have to develop some connectors... I would need a connector that connects to a REST service and that uses client ID in secret... They provide the means to develop a connector and use it, but they should implement this because REST services are among the most used protocols for web services."
"I would like to see the automation process included in the next release."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."
"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"Mobile apps need improvement."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
"The new version could be improved."
"While I can't speak to the market impact, as a developer, I've seen significant reductions in development time across different versions of our applications. One area for improvement would be the UI controls in Service Studio. Sometimes, controls don't appear in the IDE, requiring us to check them in the web browser instead. Overall, our experience with OutSystems has been positive, though improvements in UI development would be welcomed."
"Mobile apps should have been fully native."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"The integration Studio could be improved. It needs a tool in which we could develop C# code and then integrate into OutSystems. The application could have a better UI."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
Bizagi is ranked 10th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 2nd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA and Apache Airflow, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and GitHub CoPilot. See our Bizagi vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.