We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 13th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, MuleSoft Composer and SnapLogic.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi,
If you are looking for a cost-effective solution you should look to the Google Cloud Platform. It offers a lot of possibilities and you only pay processing time.
We are using this platform to integrate data from SAP and other systems and are still discovering the possibilities of the platform. After 3 months of intensive development and testing with 4-5 people, the cost is not exceeding 250 Euro. Our knowledge when we started was nihil.
I don't thank you'll find a better engineered, well though out, and higher performing platform than Boomi. In conjunction with Boomi flow (formerly ManyWho) for BPM, Boomi can handle all of your integration needs. Probably the slickest offering on the market.
You have to clearly look at integration/data exchange patterns for real-time/ near real-time / batch between ERP and your client systems. An integration reference architecture identifying integration points is key. The tools highlighted don't sound they may check the box on everything. Key is rationalizing your patterns with the right fit for purpose stack
and conduct a few use case-based technology validations. I would say pick a client/clients for a pilot as well and keep evolving.
If you have a budget constraint, limit your validations to pilot clients, but use the reference architecture to guide integrations and validations.
I would suggest a lean DevOps with a CI/CD (Continuous integration/ Continuous delivery) construct to keep constantly delivering outcomes preferably with cloud. Only a cloud will give you the flexibility to start small and expand as you need.
This is the best answer I can give you given your situation. For more details, call me to discuss.
We are currently on-prem on Oracle ERP 11i and planning to migrate to Cloud Version. I have been looking at the middleware tools and finally want to go with Oracle PaaS technology with the Oracle Integration Cloud Services. I am not sure if Dell Boomi and Cast Iron could be leveraged to build complex integrations with the flexibility and scalability in mind. We have very many third-party integrations and wanted to embrace much reliable middleware that could be scalable in point of time. I wish to add, MFT services, API management, AI and ML to the existing as we move forward.
You could try SOACS or Apiary from Oracle. The licensing prices are available and can be checked into.
I would add SnapLogic into that mix but the three he listed along with SnapLogic are the top modern iPaaS platforms currently. Not sure what direction Salesforce will take Mulesoft.
SnapLogic is more of an enterprise scale solution and may be too expensive. I currently building the platform he references for my firm using an ecosystem approach as this area is complex and no one technology can cover all of it. We are focused on a microservices approach to delivering specific capabilities in each of the areas referenced below.
As considering the definitive cost factor, the only ESB (that I would use in that cost level) that has equal licensing costs comes from JBoss (or RedHat, if the commercial support is needed).
I have had now few projects where the RH’s Fuse has been used and it has been adequate to all customer requirements.
Personally, I have not any experience of the Jitterbit Harmony, so that also could solve your needs.
I’m not sure that would the Mule standard version fulfill all your needs, as usually, you have soon to get it’s Enterprise version to solve your needs/regs. But, otherwise, the Mule is very powerful also.
To my knowledge, the Mule Enterprise and Dell Boom do have a much higher price tag.
Thanks,
Art
IBM APP connect provides an integration hub for complex integrations inside
enterprise.
It offers cloud solution as well and is suitable to be the glue application
for no matter on-premise or cloud applications.
If a client needs to expose their API to external partners, I would like to
suggest another IBM product named APIC which is an API gateway similar to
Mulesoft AnyPoint listed below.
I would recommend to use Mulesoft AnyPoint and Runtime for your scenarios mentioned below
And also explore & follow API-Led Connectivity integration architecture, design & implementation approach during API Lifecycle (that can scale & reusable) and wish you also look into examples in MuleSoft Exchange to speed up the development process.
Search in MuleSoft Exchange for “Catalyst Accelerator for Retail” to look into reference API-led Connectivity implementation templates & RAML Specs.
From Cost perspective, please reach out to MuleSoft Sales team for negotiated prices.
Thanks!
Bharath