We performed a comparison between Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it can be fully integrated with Microsoft solutions and it doesn't impact the productivity order."
"In terms of features, the querying is great."
"I think this is a good product for enterprises because of the performance and out-of-the-box rules and use cases. If they want to reach the maturity level early, they can use these out-of-the-box rules and use cases. That will help them a lot."
"What I like about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is that it uses machine learning algorithms to generate risk scoring for the user activity. I also like that it syncs with our Active Directory users, so it really has full coverage for all users in our environment."
"The monitoring and dashboards are great."
"The ability to transition from microscopic to macroscopic view, instantly, is very good."
"The product provides a complete platform for ingesting the log, doing the correlations and handling the runtime."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Customer service is very good and very helpful."
"Vulnerability detection is the most valuable feature. It's the tool that finds the threats."
"The pricing could be improved. It needs to be reduced."
"The customer service and support could improve their approach to questioning issues. They tend to ask questions one at a time, which creates a lot of back-and-forth communication."
"The solution should include remote action capabilities."
"The dashboard and reports are not user-friendly or efficient so are of little help with threat hunting activity."
"The quality of technical support depends on the IBM support person. Sometimes, it's hard to get the right person on the other side. A ticket coordinator could be the key to better quality delivery."
"There are areas in IBM Security QRadar that could benefit from improvement. Its ability to customize knowledge for specific purposes could be enhanced. Also, it lacks clarity in presenting details. It is also difficult to see the reports."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics could improve machine learning use cases because they are limited and most of the use cases are rule-based. They should develop more use cases, such as in Securonix or Exabeam because they will detect a threat. Using machine learning is mainly on the correlation rules, but if you think about Exabeam or Securonix, they detect using machine learning or machine learning-based algorithms."
"From a functionality point of view there are issues sometimes."
"Do your research before implementing it, because it is tough to implement."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
More Change Auditor for Windows File Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is ranked 55th in Log Management with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is rated 9.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Change Auditor for Windows File Servers writes "Provides granular queries of security logs and real-time alerting helps me mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is most compared with Quest InTrust, Wazuh and Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.