We performed a comparison between Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."In terms of features, the querying is great."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it can be fully integrated with Microsoft solutions and it doesn't impact the productivity order."
"The most valuable features are the modules and metrics."
"The log monitoring and analysis tools are great in addition to SIEM file activity monitoring."
"The product’s interface is intuitive."
"It is a stable solution."
"Wazuh is simple to use for PCI compliance."
"I like the features we use, including malware detection, inventory, detection of hidden processes, and activity logs. Inventory is probably the most important feature. It tells us when processes and packages were installed and what they are, which is helpful."
"I like the cloud-native infrastructure and that it's free. We didn't have to pay anything, and it has the capabilities of many premium solutions in the market. We could integrate all of our services and infrastructure in the cloud with Wazuh. From an integration point of view, Wazuh is pretty good. I had a good experience with this platform."
"The configuration assessment and Pile integrity monitoring features are decent."
"The pricing could be improved. It needs to be reduced."
"The customer service and support could improve their approach to questioning issues. They tend to ask questions one at a time, which creates a lot of back-and-forth communication."
"There's not much I like about Wazuh. Other products I've used were a lot more functional and user friendly. They came with reports and use cases out of the box. We need to configure Wazuh's alerts and monitoring capabilities manually. It'd be nice if we could select from templates and presets for use cases already built and coded."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"Since it's an open-source tool, scalability is the main issue."
"Log data analysis could be improved. My IT team has been looking for an alternative because they want better log data for malware detection. We are also doing more container implementation also, so we need better container security, log data analysis, auditing and compliance, malware detection, etc."
"I think that the next release should be more suitable for large enterprises, because currently they are not because large companies do not rely on open source solutions."
"The implementation is very complex."
"There could be a hardware monitoring tool for the solution."
"The computing resources are consuming and do not make sense."
More Change Auditor for Windows File Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →
Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is ranked 55th in Log Management with 2 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is rated 9.0, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Change Auditor for Windows File Servers writes "Provides granular queries of security logs and real-time alerting helps me mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is most compared with Quest InTrust and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, AlienVault OSSIM, Splunk Enterprise Security and Graylog.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.