We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and SAP Mobile Secure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."It has helped with compliance. It has helped to ensure that devices comply with the organization's policy. If they are not compliant and secure, they cannot access the resources."
"Among the most valuable features are the Company Portal that is built into Intune, and the update rings so that we can manage what types of future updates the devices get."
"The initial setup is not overly complex or difficult."
"It is quite policy-enabled, so you can build pretty much any policy to manage remote endpoints."
"Based on my experience, I find Intune very flexible for managing Windows devices. We can use scripting, and we can make use of the self-service portal or the company portal to publish some of the applications for Windows."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune."
"The ability to switch between Affinity and non-Affinity enrollment is great."
"One of the biggest advantages of Microsoft Intune is that it brings the management of Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and even Linux under a single pane of glass."
"We use this solution for MDM."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"We can reconfigure a client’s setup remotely with minimal effort."
"The solution is simple."
"The cloud dashboard's analytics data is particularly valuable, giving me insights into user activities and making it easy to track and manage devices."
"Security is the main feature because the company is reliable."
"The best features of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager include its simplicity and ease of use. It is straightforward to set up and manage devices compared to other products."
"It's very easy to just keep adding devices as needed."
"Everything is available to you from your handset."
"When somebody has a customized application or their own company's application, we cannot deploy that application."
"What would make this product better is adding more security policies and features in the next upgrade."
"The biggest problem we ever have is when something goes out of date after 30 days when nobody has logged into it. We do have a problem trying to get those back online. We've been working with Microsoft to resolve that problem, but that's been the only issue that we've had in the last few years."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"It would be good if, in addition to the minimal patching and compliance, we could also use Intune for application deployment. For instance, if a device is not patched, Intune should have the ability to push not only a Microsoft patch but also other patches, such as a browser patch."
"It just doesn't handle software updates well at all by itself. You need to be a scripting wizard to make those happen properly, or you use third-party tools. The Windows feature updates are very difficult to implement. I would like to see a proprietary built-in remote control tool. I know that they have Team Viewer integrated, but it is not seamless. It would be nice if they had a seamless remote desktop capability directly from the Intune console."
"I would like the ability to install the agent on devices from suppliers, which would enable us to implement a zero-trust strategy for guest devices."
"An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it."
"Meraki is limiting our connections."
"Sometimes, the integrations are a bit tough."
"Cisco's authorized scripting can be complicated. For example, we sometimes enter the wrong code using this script, and then we had to dictate to find the problem."
"There are problems with the connection on the client side, and the app that was deployed could be better."
"They need to allocate more energy in terms of their offering to devices that are not Apple devices."
"It doesn't seem to be able to establish some VPN tunnels with other devices in a particular way that such as an ASA can do for us."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a four out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. It is more difficult."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"We would like it if SAP could integrate the transactional mode as well so that users can perform transactional jobs by mobile-only."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while SAP Mobile Secure is ranked 26th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while SAP Mobile Secure is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Secure writes "Easy to use and set up with easy mobile access to reports". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas SAP Mobile Secure is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.