Fortify Application Defender vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
1,930 views|1,621 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
5,423 views|4,191 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Application Defender and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically feed it rules what it's coupled with the WebInspect dynamic application scanning technology.""The tool's most valuable feature is software composition analysis. This feature works well with my .NET applications, providing a better understanding of library vulnerabilities.""Its ability to find security defects is valuable.""We are able to provide out customers with a secure application after development. They are no longer left wondering if they are vulnerable to different threats within the market following deployment.""The solution helped us to improve the code quality of our organization.""Fortify Application Defender's most valuable features are machine learning algorithms, real-time remediation, and automatic vulnerability notifications.""The most valuable feature is that it analyzes data in real-time.""The product saves us cost and time."

More Fortify Application Defender Pros →

"Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production.""The solution is easy to use.""The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman.""There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base.""The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.""We are now deploying less defects to production.""You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI.""The UI was very intuitive."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

Cons
"Fortify Application Defender could improve by supporting more code languages, such as GRAAS and Groovy.""The solution is quite expensive.""The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and security checks. Many independent and open-source tools are available, from Apache to various libraries. Using multiple DevOps pipeline tools can slow the turnaround time.""Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking.""I encountered many false positives for Python applications.""The solution could improve the time it takes to scan. When comparing it to SonarQube it does it in minutes while in Fortify Application Defender it can take hours.""Fortify Application Defender gives a lot of false positives.""The workbench is a little bit complex when you first start using it."

More Fortify Application Defender Cons →

"They should have a better UI for dashboards.""We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future.""I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.""The pricing has room for improvement.""The dashboard, for AppScan or the Fortified fast tool, which we use needs to be improved.""HCL AppScan needs to improve security.""It has crashed at times.""The solution could improve by having a mobile version."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."
  • "The price of this solution could be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."
  • "Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."
  • "The product’s price is much higher than other tools."
  • "I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."
  • More Fortify Application Defender Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy.
    Top Answer:The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for fast code review. It is integrated into our DevOps pipeline.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
    Top Answer:Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its… more »
    Top Answer:I mainly use AppScan to secure various types of applications. I use its DAFDAT solution for black box scanning, as well as SaaS and source code validation. AppScan helps in scanning code for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,930
    Comparisons
    1,621
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    325
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    5,423
    Comparisons
    4,191
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Logistics Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Retailer10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Application Defender is ranked 30th in Application Security Tools with 11 reviews while HCL AppScan is ranked 15th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews. Fortify Application Defender is rated 7.8, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortify Application Defender writes "Useful for fast code review in devOps pipelines ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". Fortify Application Defender is most compared with Checkmarx One, CAST Application Intelligence Platform, Coverity, SonarQube and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional. See our Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.