We compared Fortinet FortiGate and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, the Fortinet FortiGate and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform differ in various aspects. The setup process for Fortinet FortiGate is generally simple, whereas Versa SASE Platform necessitates specialized knowledge and training. Fortinet FortiGate impresses users with its user-friendly interface and robust security measures, whereas Versa SASE Platform stands out with advantageous features like main steering and firewall capabilities. Some areas that could be improved for Fortinet FortiGate are pricing and reporting, while Versa SASE Platform requires enhancements in stability and user interface. In general, Fortinet FortiGate is commended for its return on investment and customer service, whereas Versa SASE Platform offers competitive pricing and solid technical support with room to grow.
"The web filtering feature and the intrusion protection system are the most valuable. It is a resilient appliance. I never had an issue with it in terms of any security breaches."
"The most valuable feature is the web filter."
"The base firewall features are quite valuable to us."
"The email protection and VPN features are the most valuable."
"The solution is highly scalable because they have devices that can handle a large amount of traffic."
"The reporting you receive out of this appliance is excellent. You will not need an external management system."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the APIs. They are the most widely known."
"The most valuable feature is the policy routing and application control."
"It's very powerful, especially for engineering teams."
"Our organization finds the application routing features extremely useful."
"It is very easy to deploy. The GUI interface is really good, and the security features are also very good. It is also stable and scalable, and their support is also good."
"Our customers are very satisfied with this solution. They have not mentioned any areas for improvement."
"The granularity when it comes to configuration and security features are valuable."
"Their dashboard is also a good point for us and the customer. The solution is very clean and easy."
"Versa FlexVNF is a scalable product because it does not have any hardware dependencies. This makes it a versatile solution that can be easily integrated with any firewall."
"The initial setup is simple."
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Pros →
"The updates Fortinet provides are sometimes unstable."
"It can be a little bit more user-friendly in terms of policy definition and implementation. It seems a little bit complicated, and it could be simplified."
"It would be ideal if they had some sort of GUI interface for troubleshooting and diagnostics."
"Some of the software stability could improve."
"The non-error conserve mode has room for improvement."
"The reports are very basic."
"It would be good if they had fewer updates."
"The scalability could be better."
"Another thing that should be improved in Versa are their firewall features."
"We are thinking about how to make customers consolidate the loads to an SD-WAN network so that the customers can have bigger chunk from the SD-WAN side so that customers can have critical data be transferred with NPS VPN and non-critical data or some labeled traffic can be transferred by the SD-WAN network. I think it's a very important direction for digital transformation."
"I heard about them for the first time just before I started working on Versa. They do have blogs for information, but they could publicize more about the documentation and architecture. It doesn't seem to have that much exposure, and they should work on their customer base more."
"Future releases should contain AI for the voice feature."
"The web interface can be improved."
"We've had the odd occasional stability issue with software upgrades."
"The solution lacks a mobile version where small, manageable platforms can be developed."
"The smaller units lack a lot of functionality."
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Cons →
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 306 reviews while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is ranked 8th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 20 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4, while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "It's a reliable solution that's easy to install and cheaper than competitors ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform writes "A flexible, stable and scalable solution ". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and WatchGuard Firebox, whereas Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Meraki SD-WAN and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform report.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.