We performed a comparison between Harness and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."
"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"I need some more graphical design."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
Harness is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 1 review while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Harness is rated 7.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and GitLab, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.