We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"A stable and solid product."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The product can scale."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"I would rate scalability a nine out of ten."
"PeopleSoft has been fairly reliable for us. We haven't had any issues with stability."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"PeopleSoft allows you to schedule upgrades and inform users beforehand. This gives your IT team time to manage the implementation and minimize disruption."
"I'd like PeopleSoft to be like on the cloud and more mobile-friendly. If I try to access it from a cell phone, it's a bit difficult, so it would be great if PeopleSoft could improve these features."
"The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"Areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically."
"The UI and user experience are not great, and it's not as feature-rich as today's systems. Furthermore, our implementation does not include all the components we need, like payroll or some other functions."
"Scalability is not there in PeopleSoft. Its performance and resilience are also very bad. When you're trying to stretch it, it breaks. It is not resilient. It is also not stable. It is stable as far as data is concerned, but the infrastructure is not stable."
"My developers want to use more HTML instead of the specialized tool, PeopleTools because, they say, it's better from a user perspective."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"The whole systematic flow of any query raised to HR should be improved."
"The Work Center feature in PeopleSoft is a step in the right direction in consolidating someone's role-based interaction with the system. This enhanced functionality streamlines workflows and improves efficiency."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 12th in ERP with 80 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and UKG. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best ERP vendors, best Activity Based Costing Software vendors, and best Demand Management vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.