We performed a comparison between Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and Ruckus Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The solution is very secure."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"Zero-handoff is one of the top features. The client balancing between the access points is good. Its security is also fine."
"Once we got it set up and configured we've had little issues and it's been relatively stable. We use it across all seven of our offices and they all have the exact same wifi setup so when I go into any office I can get on the network and access resources."
"Configurations are highly customizable and we could tune easily to suit our Wi-Fi requirements."
"Our IT staff can quickly issue guest passes for vendors and the instructions are very straightforward, requiring very little effort to get connected."
"The product can scale."
"The controller is most valuable. Through Ruckus ZoneDirector, we can easily manage the websites and the web."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"One area where Ruckus Wireless could improve is its technical support."
"Its interface could be a little bit more user friendly."
"I would like to see more location-based services on the Smart Cell Insight on access points."
"The price has room for improvement."
"Its pricing and licensing can be improved. Its UI can also be more user-friendly. Currently, in the Unleashed mode, the information that you have about the switches that you add to the controller is quite limited. I would like more information regarding switches. In this mode, an access point acts as a controller, so you don't need a controller. It is for deployments with less than 125 access points, and you can use an access point as a controller."
"Sometimes doing mass changes on their products can be challenging."
"The cost could be slightly improved. It's not on the low end, and it's not in the high end. It's in that middle area, which can be a deciding factor between someone going with this solution versus another one."
"I wish that Ruckus Wireless were more affordable for customers."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is ranked 10th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews while Ruckus Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 97 reviews. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is rated 8.8, while Ruckus Wireless is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points writes "Offers good performance, good solution and smooth implementation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Great wireless, good reliability, and excellent connectivity". Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Mist AI and Cloud, whereas Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and ExtremeWireless. See our Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Ruckus Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.