We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."The solution is easy to use and it has good performance."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"For our office workers who are not based in Norway, when we order the PC, we can do some of the settings for them. These are standardized settings. We can set them up exactly as they are in Norway so that they're the same."
"Remote Wipe and Autopilot is one of the best features."
"It has improve our organization through the remote management of non-domain joined devices."
"There are so many features, but Windows Autopilot is one of the features that are very valuable for most customers."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"It supports end-users who tend to lock their devices quite frequently. Its conditional access policy helps us keep the users logged into their devices."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"From a remote management perspective, I like the management and the inventory."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the corporate email pushing."
"The platform provides a stable environment for operations and quickly creates new environments. Additionally, it offers efficient flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it enables us to remotely manage the devices, which is its purpose, and to push applications to the mobile devices from the portal."
"The contained browser is a good feature."
"The solution has very good documentation."
"It's all about securing data with the help of the email client called VMware Boxer. It enables the end-user to carry data in their mobile devices but there is containerization between the personal data and the organization's data. It helps enhance their security while still carrying their own BYOD."
"For me, the integration of AirWatch with various enterprise components is something I like. The way they are partnering with various services, like security services, or some of the big guys like Google, Android, Apple, and including Microsoft; that's really awesome. And the way they look at providing functionality to create self-service and automation, that's really usefully and beneficial. That's where I see they differentiate themselves."
"The reporting needs to be a bit more interactive."
"Additional application deployment options e.g. MSI deployment with more complex parameters or additional side-by-side files, and non-MSI deployment options."
"I would like to see the ability to deploy custom packages as a Windows 64-bit package, as opposed to the Windows 32-bit, which is the only one available now."
"In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune."
"The mobile and tablet-based versions need improvement because they are not completely user-friendly, compared to the web version. Also, data synchronization with our existing asset manager, the synchronization between multiple assets and multiple devices, takes a lot of time due to the security scanning. It should be reduced."
"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."
"Technical support is not that great."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
"The pricing could always be better."
"Pricing is a limitation. I think it's on the higher side, so if it were cheaper, it would benefit more organizations."
"From an improvement perspective, there is a need for discounts to be offered by the solution since it is something that any organization can expect from the product."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive to our requests."
"Setup is not too complex."
"The reverse proxy is not intuitive and it takes time to get it right, so this is something that can be improved."
"There could be ease of integration within the environment. I didn't have any issues when using it, but the integration part was a bit difficult for the other team."
"The mobile device repository is somewhat difficult to manage with a large user base."
ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 82 reviews. ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Google Endpoint Management, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Citrix Workspace.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
