We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management."The solution is stable."
"The technical support is good."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager is integrated with other Microsoft products."
"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."
"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to deploy patches to nearly all applications."
"The solution effectively handles inventory management, deployment, and reporting."
"Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."
"I would like to see more automation."
"The tool's deployment is complex and depends on the architecture you want to implement."
"As far as load balancing across, they don't have that support yet, so that you can actually build multiple primaries and have it load balance across. They don't have any of that functionality yet. That would be a nice feature, to scale that way."
"The solution is a bit heavy on the sources such as RAM or CPU and the software needs to be a bit lighter."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could improve the integration."
"I'm looking for a single solution for all discovery needs. It fulfills about 40% of the requirements, and I'd like to see the other 60% so that I don't have to keep doing this."
"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 12th in Patch Management with 1 review. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Tanium and Microsoft Intune, whereas SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and BigFix.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.