We compared One Identity Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
One Identity Manager is praised for its robust access control capabilities, user lifecycle management, and excellent customer service. In contrast, SailPoint IdentityIQ stands out for its comprehensive access management, user provisioning, and efficient role management functionalities. While One Identity Manager offers flexibility and scalability, SailPoint IdentityIQ is known for its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards. Both products offer positive ROI and competitive pricing, with One Identity Manager focusing on security and compliance, and SailPoint IdentityIQ on operational efficiency and enhanced security measures. Areas for improvement include UI enhancements for One Identity Manager, and more customization options for SailPoint IdentityIQ.
Features: One Identity Manager offers robust access control, comprehensive reporting, and seamless integration. Users value its role-based access control and self-service capabilities. On the other hand, SailPoint IdentityIQ excels in access management, user provisioning, role management, and customizable dashboards. It provides automation and effective access certifications.
Pricing and ROI: One Identity Manager has favorable pricing structure with reasonable setup costs and flexible licensing options according to user experiences. In comparison, SailPoint IdentityIQ also offers reasonable pricing that is competitive, with a manageable setup cost. Users find the licensing process straightforward and transparent., One Identity Manager has shown significant ROI with improved efficiency, streamlined processes, and reduced costs. SailPoint IdentityIQ delivers operational efficiency, improved user access management, and enhanced security measures for organizations.
Room for Improvement: One Identity Manager could improve the user interface, user experience, workflows, integration with other systems, and offer better documentation and support resources. SailPoint IdentityIQ needs enhancements in its user interface, customization options, and improved navigation for new users.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, it appears that both One Identity Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ have varying timeframes for establishing a new tech solution. While some users reported spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, others mentioned needing only a week for both deployment and setup. The different timeframes should be considered when evaluating the overall duration of each product., One Identity Manager shines with its highly rated and exceptional customer service, praised for prompt and efficient responses, professionalism, and expertise. SailPoint IdentityIQ receives positive remarks for its responsive and knowledgeable support team, effective assistance, and professionalism.
The summary above is based on 57 interviews we conducted recently with One Identity Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to 30 percent of the time we spent on provisioning access."
"As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configurable to meet our specific needs."
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships."
"Omada offers a technical solution that addresses both our needs."
"The support for the validity of the resources is valuable. The tool allows resource assignments within a validity period so that the managers do not have to remember to revoke the access once the work is done."
"It has a very user-friendly interface compared to what we are used to, and it is highly configurable. In the old solution, when we needed to do something, we had to have a programmer sitting next to us, whereas, in Omada Identity, everything is configurable."
"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."
"For me, the best feature of Omada Identity is its web interface because it's really easy for users to understand."
"One Identity Manager stands out for its extensive functionality."
"The policy and role management features are superb. If you have a customer who is willing to go somewhere with role management, then the possibilities are endless with the product. It is well-structured, and the architecture is well-defined."
"In terms of what the most valuable feature of One Identity Manager is, that would be hard to say because the tool is great overall. There's not really one feature you'd prefer over other features, but what's really great, in my opinion, is the fact that the provisioning is really stable and accurate, and it's a process my company trusts. This means that without a lot of maintenance, I can be pretty sure that as soon as my alternative source gives a new identity or gives new information about a particular identity, everything will be transformed and executed the right way. My company has tried other solutions and there's always a struggle with the provisioning system in terms of knowing what systems work, but with One Identity Manager, this issue doesn't happen. It's also a stable system which I like."
"The company policies feature is really good because in workflows you can check whether the policies are all working."
"The back-end, its capabilities, and workflows are very good."
"We have been able to make our help desk self-sufficient by giving them role-based access. We have been able to reduce service dependency by 40% to 50%."
"This is almost a complete solution for us."
"For the recertification and segregation of duties, it's easier to know all the information about our employees. If we need to delete some information, we can do it from a central point, then it can be deleted on all our searches. This is very good for GDPR."
"The support is very good."
"We like the integration with other systems."
"It provides a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities. You don't have to do too much custom development like other solutions such as Microsoft or NetIQ. It also has a lot of out-of-the-box connectors for different sources, directories, databases, etc. Its cloud version is working very well, and its pricing is okay. Its value for money is fine for most of the customers. It is also very flexible. They have frequent new releases and patches for fixing errors and things like that."
"The most powerful feature of the solution is its platform-based approach. Unlike other solutions, this tool offers a high level of customization. It is an open and flexible platform, allowing users to tailor it to their needs. This ability to customize and adapt the solution to individual requirements makes the solution stand out as a powerful product."
"I like IdentityIQ's granular attachment management and certification customization features."
"I find the built-in connectors, lifecycle management, certification, and recertification features to be the most valuable."
"The solution’s stability and performance are good."
"The compliance features are the most valuable features."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"Omada's performance could be better because we had some latency issues. Still, it's difficult to say how much of that is due to Omada versus the resources used by our other vendors in our on-prem environment. Considering the resources we have invested into making it run well, it's slightly slower than we would expect."
"If you find an error and you need it fixed, you have to upgrade. It's not like they say, "Okay, we'll fix this problem for you." You have to upgrade. The last time we upgraded, because there was an error in a previous version, we had to pay 150,000 Danish Krone (about $24,000 at the time of this review) to upgrade our systems... That means that we have to pay to get errors fixed that Omada has made in programming the system. I hope they change this way of looking at things."
"I would like to search on date fields, which is not possible now."
"We are still on Omada on-prem, but I understand that when Omada is in the cloud, you cannot send an attachment via email. We have some emails with attachments for new employees because we have to explain to them how to register and do their multi-factor authentication. All that information is in the attachment. People have to do that before they are in our system. We cannot give them a link to our Intranet and SharePoint because they do not yet have access. They have to register before that, so I need to send the attachments, but this functionality is not there in the cloud."
"Functionality and usability could be improved."
"I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."
"The comprehensiveness of Omada's out-of-the-box connectors for the applications we use could be better. We are getting a new HR system called Cornerstone for which they do not have an out-of-the-box connector, so we have to take the REST connector and play around with it."
"I would like to integrate automated testing with One Identity, and it would be great to have some support from the vendor on here."
"One Identity Manager is currently in the process of modernizing its UI, which I hope will result in a more user-friendly interface for its Identity Manager. However, it is uncertain whether they have plans to consolidate their various tools into a unified system to simplify configuration and tasks."
"It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal."
"There are a few aspects of One Identity Manager's user experience that could be improved."
"We fell into that trap of over-customization which made upgrading the product difficult."
"A room for improvement in One Identity Manager is its analytics. Though it's getting better from version to version, the analytics feature still needs improvement. I would appreciate more analytical features in the next release of One Identity Manager, so I can do a better analysis. Another vendor, for example, has a self-certification system where you can send people, then create a type of profile or screen for each person, and the person can see his entitlement and the risks behind that entitlement, so then the person makes a decision on whether he wants to keep or let go of it, and that's an out-of-the-box feature that would be good to see in One Identity Manager. Another feature I'd like to see in One Identity Manager that would be very interesting is integration with SIEM or any log collection product for both access and usage. For example, I'd be able to see that I have access to a particular application and also get information on how many times I've accessed it in the last year, last few months, etc. It's a feature that would be great to have in One Identity Manager."
"The identity governance components have some room for improvement, particularly the ability to terminate an employee's ID after leaving the company."
"The user interface needs to improve."
"The connectors are far too manual. This needs to be automated a bit."
"If you compare Saviynt and Okta Workforce Identity versus SailPoint IdentityIQ, SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its UI."
"We have had a lot of service breaks because of the lack of support."
"Competitors are advancing by offering integrated solutions encompassing access and privileged access management in a single unified platform. IdentityIQ's focus has remained primarily on identity and access governance, neglecting to expand its offerings to include these additional functionalities within its existing product. Enhancing their product by incorporating modules for access management, privileged access management, and third-party access governance could address this gap."
"One needs to understand that SailPoint is into full-fledged IAM practice with a long-term vision, and customers will get a quick ROI with best practices implementation."
"The user interface is not very user-friendly."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its customization. It should also incorporate some standardized tools for implementation."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ could be cheaper."
More SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
One Identity Manager is ranked 2nd in User Provisioning Software with 77 reviews while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 62 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "The JML is customizable but the support team isn't strong". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint Identity Security Cloud writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". One Identity Manager is most compared with Oracle Identity Governance, EVOLVEUM midPoint, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), ForgeRock and Saviynt, whereas SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, Microsoft Identity Manager and SAP Identity Management. See our One Identity Manager vs. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
