We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"The most valuable features are the collaboration and sharing."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps."
"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."
"For SharePoint, I believe the most valuable feature is the customization and allowing you to share and edit files and documents. Being able to share externally and the precise administration of the files in terms of giving permissions and controlling who has access to what is a very good feature."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"Its functions need more stability."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
"The navigation is confusing."
"Make it more intuitive."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"When you are trying to migrate from a different platform to SharePoint for file storage, the upload utility should be more flexible, taking more files and then updating you on the upload status of the files you are trying to transfer into SharePoint."
"Using SharePoint is difficult."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and IBM FileNet, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors, best Web Content Management vendors, and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.