We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet and Oracle WebCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the interconnectivity and the collaboration. No longer do I have to wonder what system I need to go to for the data I need. I know it's in FileNet."
"The most useful feature is its persistent storage. Also, the full-text search and attribute searching are valuable."
"The beauty is the response time. It is very good nowadays within the platform."
"It saves our customers time by 30 to 40 percent by eliminating the time to process paper."
"I have found that it scales well."
"I would say the workflow is pretty good. Also, the flexibility of being able to create custom objects with a lot of domain-specific attributes that we follow."
"Streamlined our business processes."
"It has given us a whole new environment to do document management and document storage."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"We would like to have more automation of rollout solutions."
"If there was more AI capability, into Watson, that would be a benefit."
"In Content Navigator we want to see the ability to view different types of video... We are using HTML 5 but it's very limited... We definitely want to see support for most types of video formats in the market."
"In terms of functionality, what customers might be looking for is a little more in terms of native-records retention. Records Management is an add-on product. If there were just a little more of that built into the core functionality, that would be helpful."
"The initial setup was pretty complex. There are too many options, and it can get a bit confusing."
"It could be simpler to use, considering multiple use cases."
"The initial setup is complex. It is complex because there are several pieces of software that have to be installed in the right order to make it work alright."
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"Its functions need more stability."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
IBM FileNet is ranked 6th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 8.2, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Atlassian Confluence, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and OpenText Documentum. See our IBM FileNet vs. Oracle WebCenter report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.